|

Speech by Eve Hillary
In the free and prosperous 1970’s Donald and Therese Mackay lived as a typical Aussie couple.
They rented a pretty cottage for $12 a week where they raised their two daughters, Alison and Melissa in the
sleepy NSW town of Port
Macquarie. Even then, Don and Therese cared about people. Their tireless
community work clearly showed their humanitarian values.
‘Then one sunny day in January 1982’ - Therese writes in her book - ‘life changed’. Don broke
his neck at work and became a quadriplegic. The public hospital system of the 1980’s gave him emergency care and
rehabilitation. When he returned home, Therese became Don’s full time carer. Despite his severe disability Don
overcame all obstacles and resumed his role as husband and father. Therese remained a devoted wife and
incredibly, together they continued giving to their community. They supported social justice and access to good
health care for all Australians.
In 2007, after a lifetime of social contributions, it was Don who needed help from the health
care system. For 25 years, with Therese’s help, he had maintained his health and stamina despite the daunting
challenges of his quadriplegia, but now fluid was slowly accumulating in his lung and it had to be drained.
Medically it was a simple problem to fix, and people didn’t normally die from it. But the health care system
that had treated Don so adequately for a broken neck 25 years earlier had disappeared and in its place a newly
‘reformed’ health system had emerged by 2007 which Don and Therese found unrecognizable, strange and
frightening. This time a robust ginger haired Don wheeled his chair into an understaffed hospital with peeling
paint and dirt encrusted floors. Instead of a simple low risk drainage procedure, doctors chose a high risk
option not suitable for a quadriplegic. For the next five weeks Don suffered nightmarish complications and was
reduced to a wretched state of being fully conscious but unable to breathe without a respirator. After five
torturous weeks, doctors decided to withdraw Don’s ‘treatment’. This meant sending him home and without any
further ado, taking him off the ventilator. Both Don and Therese knew this was a death sentence and Therese
begged doctors to allow Don to have a home ventilator at least for a while longer but this was denied - the air
ambulance officers were instructed to remove Don from the $500 machine that was the size of a breadbox, his only
connection to life. The macabre medical arrangement was executed exactly as planned. On 17 May 2007 Don was
transported back to his home in Port Macquarie, fully alert. He believed that his life no longer mattered to the
health care system, and that health professionals had made the decision to ‘terminate’ his life. Those were the
terms he was forced to accept if he was to be allowed to go home - and he desperately wanted to go home after
what he had endured at the hospital. It wasn’t the way he had wanted to die and Therese had tried everything
humanly possible to avoid such a terrible death for Don. For emotionally normal people it is agonizing even to
imagine what Don’s last thoughts might have been when the ambulance officers removed from him the machine that
helped him to breathe. After the medics left with the machine, Don lived for several hours longer, surrounded by
Therese and his two daughters. Don was fully conscious and mentally sharp and his heart was still strong until
the very end when he simply couldn’t manage another breath for himself.
Two months ago, Therese Mackay generously sent me her manuscript to preview. After reading
‘Without Due Care’, I cried for Therese and for her two daughters and I mourned for Don. After that, I wept
again, this time for the hospital where I had once worked for over a decade. I had walked those corridors,
worked in those intensive care units where Don had spent his final weeks - but had done so years
before the ‘health care
reforms’.
In 1987 I was a proud member of an intensive care health team in a public hospital with an
international reputation for excellence. We attracted the best clinicians, VMOs and nursing staff in the
country. We were affiliated with a top Sydney University,
conducted world class research and ground breaking surgery. We pioneered transplantation and I was proud to be a
part of medical technologies that helped people and saved lives. Yes, we had dying patients - most were
unconscious, but we strove to give them as much comfort and dignity as possible. In my 35 years in high level
health care, we had never withdrawn a ventilator from a patient who was not irreversibly brain dead, and I had
never heard of a conscious patient having their ventilator turned off and be left to die because a system had
deemed it. So, what happened?
I began my health care career in 1969 when the hospital system was not-for-profit and operated
to serve the needs of the community. As a professional, I had an ethical code and my hospital’s regulations to
live up to, but most of all I was there to serve the patient’s needs. I never considered my role as making money
for a corporation.
Changes to the system began in the 1988 when the NSW Government awarded private health
corporations lucrative contracts to build private hospitals on sites already occupied by public hospitals -
called co-location. The corporations persuaded certain government ministers that their proposed private
hospitals would take the pressure off the public system and save taxpayers money. Instead, it cost taxpayers
even more, as private companies tapped a rich vein of public money through PPP’s (private public partnerships).
Throughout the 1990’s the government bestowed contracts onto corporations like confetti until the NSW
Auditor-General, Mr Tony Harris warned that public servants should not enter into grossly disadvantageous [to
the taxpayer] deals with the private sector and that, ‘the Government is, in effect, paying for the hospital
twice and giving it away [to the corporations].’ Dr Refshauge the NSW Minister for Health agreed. ‘We are not
going to privatize hospitals. We believe that the public sector is important and should not be flogged off,’ he
said in the NSW Parliament in 1997. The Parliamentary Member for the South Coast, John Hatton argued that deals should be
transparent and revealed to the public, which has a right to know. Ironically, Donald Mackay, also spoke out
against hospital privatization and joined in a campaign to return the privatized Port Macquarie Hospital back to the people of NSW. But overall, the
deals continued and so-called hospital ‘reforms’ were fuelled by special interests and doctor advocates who
spoke out in favour of the corporations.
I recall when the first spade of earth was turned on my hospital campus. With massive
injections of millions of NSW taxpayer dollars, a health corporation built a luxurious marble and glass private
hospital over the old car-park site adjacent to the public hospital. The citadel was obscured from view behind
the public hospital building and nestled into a manicured enclave. By 1998 it opened to service the wealthy and
well insured of Sydney’s
North Shore. The health corporation ran its private hospital as
a business; but with even more taxpayer funding and bequests from wealthy socialites , the corporation’s share
price quintupled and investors were paid healthy dividends. With the global private sector takeover of the once
public hospital systems in western countries came a new philosophy which was noted by several worried health
professionals at the time. The New England Journal of Medicine (August 5, 1999) stated: ‘Our main objection to
investor-owned care is not that it wastes taxpayers' money, nor even that it causes modest decrements in
quality. The most serious problem with such care is that it embodies a new value system that severs the communal
roots and Samaritan traditions of hospitals, makes doctors and nurses the instruments of investors, and views
patients as commodities’.
By 1999 my public teaching hospital, which had loyally served the northern
Sydney public since 1885, had become
orphaned in its own home by the co-located intruder. As in twin transfusion syndrome when twins share the
same placenta unequally, the private hospital twin received all the life blood while the anaemic public twin
was barely able to stay alive. As conditions deteriorated alarmingly in the public hospital, top medical and
nursing staff left in droves resulting in a permanent staff shortage, the building fell into disrepair, the
top storeys were water damaged from a leaky roof, the floors were dirt encrusted, the windows grimy, the
toilets disgraceful and the medical equipment had deteriorated and become hopelessly outdated. By 2005, the
once world renown public hospital resembled a third world setup. Even I left the hospital after seeing where
it was headed. The health system had adopted a chilling model of economic rationalism that was well beyond
any one person’s ability to fix. I desperately hoped that the monstrous system that had destroyed this
Australian icon would not one day claim the lives of innocent people. It would be only a few short years
before my worst fears came true.
It was into this health system and into this public hospital that Donald Mackay was admitted
on April 11, 2007. He required thoughtful medical assessment, adequate nursing care and a safe and simple
procedure to be performed in a hygienic environment. He required his basic, human needs to be met. Once, all
Australian public hospitals were up to this standard of care. But Don got none of these. The system that had
destroyed this once top public hospital would also come to destroy Donald, the man who cared for people. Then it
would continue to destroy lives until it became the subject of a Parliamentary enquiry in 2007. Since then, not
much has changed systemically.
Honoured guests, I give you Therese Mackay’s book: Without Due Care. She writes on behalf of
Don, her family and for all of us. Please read it. We need to know what kind of health system we have, and how
it came to be what it is. We need to know how our Parliamentarians voted on health issues, who the special
interests are and whether they have the public interest at heart. Why? Because this could happen to you or your
family. Instead, this must never happen again. Please give your support to those candidates and others who
genuinely strive to improve the system and work in the public interest.
Eve Hillary
Journalist, Health professional
Author of Sarah’s Last Wish: a chilling glimpse into forced
medicine
www.sarahs-last-wish.com
by Eve Hillary on Without Due Care, Therese Mackay's Book - 20 October 2010
Back to Top
###
|